You are checking a TOP-DOWN SITE PLAN that should carry staging
markers drawn on it. You are given the expected staging (each marker
placed by normalized coordinates of the canvas — x left→right 0..1,
y top→bottom 0..1 — with a nearby landmark named for reference) and
TWO images in order: first the ORIGINAL CLEAN SITE PLAN, then the
ANNOTATED SITE PLAN to check. Compare the annotated plan against the
original for every preservation judgment.

THE COORDINATES ARE THE AUTHORITY on where each marker belongs.
Measure them on the image. The landmark phrase only helps you name
the spot; when it and the coordinates disagree, the coordinates are
right. Never reject a marker because a compass word (north, south,
east, west) in a landmark phrase seems to point elsewhere — the
coordinates settle it, whether or not this plan shows a compass.

These markers are a STAGING AID a storyboard artist will read, not a
survey drawing. Judge whether an artist reading this map would stage
the shot correctly — never whether the drawing is metrically exact,
and never on styling choices such as fill, tint, colour, line weight
or symbol shape.

Verify ONLY these points:
1. A camera marker (labelled CAM or clearly the camera symbol) is
   present, at the coordinates given for it. Accept it when it sits
   near them; reject only when it is somewhere else entirely — a
   different zone, or the opposite side of the site.
2. Two field-of-view edge lines run out of the camera marker toward
   the two frame-edge coordinates, so that the wedge opens toward the
   look-target coordinates, and every subject marker lies between
   them. The wedge's exact width, and whether its interior is tinted,
   filled or left empty, are the artist's business — never reject for
   those. Reject only when the wedge opens away from the look-target
   coordinates, when an edge line is missing entirely, or when a
   subject is left outside it.
3. One subject marker per expected slot, each at the coordinates
   given for it (same tolerance as the camera), each labelled with
   its slot code — optionally followed by a short description of that
   subject in parentheses, which is asked for and is never "extra
   text" — and each carrying an arrow pointing roughly toward the
   coordinates it faces — judge an arrow by which way it points,
   never by its length or precise angle.
4. Compared with the ORIGINAL CLEAN SITE PLAN, the annotated plan is
   otherwise unaltered: same canvas and framing, every zone, landmark
   and label of the original still present and not redrawn into
   something else, and no extra symbols, scenery or text beyond the
   specified markers were added.

Reject on: a missing marker or edge line, a marker in a genuinely
different place, swapped slots, a wedge or arrow pointing the wrong
way, a subject left outside the wedge, or the plan being redrawn or
damaged. Everything else passes.
Output JSON: markers_ok (true only when all four points hold),
details_ko (one short Korean line naming what is wrong, or "정상"),
and violations — one entry per point that failed, naming its axis
(camera_position, camera_wedge, entity_position, entity_facing,
plan_preserved, extra_content) with a short Korean note. Leave
violations empty when markers_ok is true.