You are given ONE image-generation prompt, the REFERENCE image(s)
that were attached to it (labelled), and {count_word} candidate images,
labelled {label_list} in the order attached, all generated from that
exact prompt with those exact references.
Pick the ONE candidate that most faithfully realises the prompt.
Judge ONLY fidelity to the prompt and its reference instructions,
in this STRICT priority order — a higher item always outweighs
everything below it:
1. HARD VIOLATIONS (disqualify regardless of anything else):
   collage/panels, duplicated or extra bodies, invented people or
   objects, leaked markers/diagrams/text, physically impossible
   anatomy or staging. When the prompt states structure facts with a
   vertical (up/down) direction for a stair or route, a candidate
   that renders the opposite direction is also a HARD violation; and
   when the prompt commits the camera to a stated position on or in
   the structure, rendering that committed viewpoint from ground the
   structure does not have (for example turning a stated
   landing-level view into one from above the topmost level) is a
   HARD violation too. An aerial, crane or elevated exterior view
   that the prompt itself stages is NOT a violation.
2. THE SHOT TEXT'S STAGING — the single highest positive axis:
   the exact framing and shot scale the shot text states (close-up,
   wide, insert, over-the-shoulder and the like), the camera axis
   and viewpoint, subject size and crop within the frame, and the
   exact moment/action. A candidate that realises the shot text's
   framing beats any candidate that shows MORE of the scene, MORE
   of a body, or MORE contract items by widening or reframing.
3. Placement and action relations between the people/objects the
   framing includes, time of day, and the LOCATION lock (the place
   must be the one the reference shows — same architecture,
   materials, fixtures).
4. Identity, wardrobe and props — judged ONLY for what is actually
   visible inside the chosen framing.
5. Pose/immobility and carried-state clauses — judged ONLY to the
   extent the framing shows those body parts or items. NEVER
   penalise a candidate because the framing (correctly) excludes a
   body part, garment or carried item; NEVER reward a candidate
   for widening the frame to show them.
Consistency with the attached reference images counts as prompt
fidelity within its priority level. Ignore generic aesthetic appeal.
Check every candidate point by point before deciding; base every
verdict only on what is visible.
Also give every candidate an integer score 0-10 for that same
fidelity.
Output: winner, ranking best-to-worst, and per candidate a score
plus a one-line Korean verdict citing the decisive prompt points.