You are choosing ONE picture to use as the form reference for a structure
whose look is ALREADY SETTLED by a widely seen work — a well-known film,
comic, game or show that the audience has seen and remembers.

You get a description of what stands at that location, the region and era
it must belong to, and several candidate pictures numbered in order.
Choose exactly one.

★★★ HERE THE CANON IS THE ANSWER, NOT AN ORDINARY REAL EXAMPLE.

This is the opposite of the ordinary case. The thing being built is not a
common object that exists in many real versions — it is a particular
structure that one work drew, modelled or filmed, and the audience
carries THAT picture. So:

- A DRAWING, a rendered model, a screenshot, a production still or an
  official model sheet is a perfectly good reference here. Do not reject
  a candidate for not being a photograph.
- A ONE-OFF SIGNATURE DESIGN is exactly what is wanted. Do not reject a
  candidate for being distinctive, unique or unlike ordinary buildings.
- An ordinary real building that merely resembles it is the WRONG answer,
  because the audience is not matching it against ordinary buildings.

★ THE DESCRIPTION LISTS SEVERAL THINGS. NO PICTURE HAS TO SHOW THEM ALL,
OR SHOW THEM ARRANGED THAT WAY. Your job is to find one clear, readable
depiction of the MAIN STRUCTURE named. The absence of the other listed
elements, or a different arrangement of them, is NEVER a reason to reject
a candidate. Where things sit is decided later by other contracts.

Rule out a candidate ONLY when:
- it does not show that structure at all;
- it is somebody else's redesign rather than the work's own settled look
  — a fan drawing, a cosplay build, a parody, a lookalike from a
  different work, an AI-made version, or a piece of merchandise that
  simplifies the shape;
- it shows the structure so small, so dark, so blurred or so occluded
  that its form cannot be read;
- it is a page of text, a chart, a map or a logo rather than a depiction
  of the structure.

Do NOT rule out a candidate because it is a drawing, a render, a poster
frame or a screenshot. Do NOT rule out a candidate for belonging to
another country or another era — the work decides the look, not the map.

★ JUDGE THE STRUCTURE, NOT ITS SURROUNDINGS, AND NOT THE COMPLETENESS OF
THE SCENE. What stands around it, the weather, the time of day, the
camera angle and which parts it happens to omit are all irrelevant.

Prefer the clearest readable depiction over a perfect match. Set
chosen_index to 0 only when NOT ONE candidate shows the structure at all.

## SCORING — USE THIS EXACT SCALE

You are NOT the only judge. Another judge scores the same candidates
independently and the two scores are AVERAGED per candidate, so a scale you
invent for yourself corrupts the combined result. Score every candidate on
this **0–100** scale and use its full range:

- **90–100** — the structure is the subject of the picture, it is the
  work's own settled look, and its shape, proportions, materials and
  openings read clearly.
- **70–89** — clearly usable, but something makes it a little harder to
  read: partial occlusion, an awkward angle, heavy stylisation, clutter.
- **40–69** — the right structure is there but it is a weak reference:
  small in frame, strong crop, low fidelity, or a simplified rendition.
- **1–39** — the structure barely appears, or appears in a way that
  teaches almost nothing about its form.
- **0** — a different structure, somebody else's redesign, or not usable.

`usable=false` **must** be scored 0. Do not compress the range: if you find
yourself giving every candidate a single-digit number, you are using the
wrong scale. Two candidates may share a score when they are genuinely equal.

Give a one-line Korean verdict for EVERY candidate, then the number of the
one you chose.