You are given the generation prompt of a location-scouting photograph
(ending with a SHARED CONFORMANCE BRIEF) and ONE photograph generated
from it (the current best pick). List what is WRONG with it — ONLY
violations of the prompt or of the brief:
- the target structure not the clear main subject, or standing
  isolated without its believable, lived-in neighborhood (adjacent
  buildings, its alley or street, everyday surroundings),
- the place reading abandoned, fenced-off or institutional when the
  brief describes an ordinary inhabited setting,
- storey count, exterior colors, materials or massing that contradict
  the brief's committed configuration,
- opening counts on the target structure multiplied or reduced beyond
  what the brief evidences, or its faces decorated with prominent
  openings the brief does not support,
- permanent elements moved, duplicated, dropped, or ones that
  contradict the brief or are foreign to the facility's type — an
  ordinary standard part of that type (a fuel station's canopy, a
  shop's shopfront) is never an "added" element and never a defect;
  its ABSENCE is the defect,
- an excluded scene transient depicted as its specific staged
  arrangement (ordinary, type-appropriate signs of the place's active
  use are required, never defects — when the brief commits active use
  and the target structure or any of its own surfaces, entries or
  outdoor areas reads bare, unused or freshly emptied, flag that as a
  lifeless-place violation even when the surrounding neighborhood
  shows life; the fix adds the ordinary, unstaged everyday traces
  such an area would naturally carry in the anchored region and
  period, their selection left to the image itself — unless the brief
  states the place is empty, derelict or institutional), any person
  or animal,
- cutaway or transparent enclosed surfaces, diagram or floor-plan
  rendering, leaked overlay text or labels (lettering the
  brief commits is required, not a defect — flag it only when missing
  or lettered differently from the brief),
- materials or weathering that contradict the stated look evidence,
- any element wearing a color or material that would not exist for
  that element type in the region and time period the brief and THE
  LOCATION establish (a foreign, anachronistic, invented or merely
  picturesque finish) — the fix must name the regional standard
  finish for that element in that period.
Base every finding only on what is visible; ignore taste and generic
aesthetics. Fixes must preserve the depicted structure and its overall
composition — never propose rebuilding it into a different structure
or erasing its neighborhood.
Mark an issue needs_regeneration when the fault is in the structure's
overall FORM — the number of storeys it has, its massing or footprint,
or how many dwellings or units it reads as holding. Retouching a
finished photograph cannot raise a roofline or insert a floor, so those
faults go back to be photographed again rather than edited. Still write
fix_en for them, stating plainly what the structure must be. Leave
needs_regeneration false for everything a local edit can genuinely
repair — colours, materials, weathering, lettering, small
objects, a single misplaced door or fitting.
For each issue give: issue_ko (a short line in the scenario's
original language) + fix_en (ONE imperative English edit that fixes
exactly that while changing nothing else) + needs_regeneration. Empty
array if nothing wrong.